PAYTM TO PAY RS 18.76 LAKH AFTER RBI COMPOUNDS FEMA VIOLATION LINKED TO SUBSIDIARY
WHAT IS THE ISSUE ?
In a stock exchange filing on Monday, the company said the RBI has imposed a compounding fee of Rs 18.76 lakh in connection with certain investments made in Little Internet Private Limited by Little Internet Singapore. The underlying transactions, with an aggregate value of about Rs 33 crore, pertained to the period between March 2016 and June 2017.
DETAILS OF THE RBI ORDER
|
PENALTY AMOUNT |
₹18.76 lakh |
|
REASON: |
FEMA contravention related
to investments in Little Internet Pvt Ltd by Little Internet Singapore. |
|
TRANSACTION VALUE: |
Approximately ₹33 crore worth of transactions
between March 2016 and June 2017. |
|
COMPANY INVOLVED: |
One 97 Communications Ltd (Paytm’s parent
company). |
|
COMPLIANCE STATUS: |
Paytm has stated it is
taking necessary steps to comply with the RBI order. |
|
COMPOUNDING ORDER: |
A compounding order allows
a company to settle FEMA contraventions by paying a fee, avoiding prolonged
litigation. |
|
NATURE OF CONTRAVENTION: |
The issue arose from
cross-border investment flows between Paytm’s Indian and Singapore entities. |
TABLE OF PENALTIES LEVIED ON PAYTM PAYMENTS BANK
|
PENALTY AMOUNT |
REASON / VIOLATION |
DATE OF ORDER |
|
₹5.39 crore |
Non-compliance with KYC
norms, failure to identify beneficial owners, weak monitoring of payout
transactions, and cyber security framework violations |
October 10, 2023 |
|
₹5.49 crore |
Violations under the
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA); linked to illegal online gambling
transactions and failure to meet anti-money laundering obligations |
February 15, 2024
(announced March 1, 2024) |
|
₹1 crore (Paytm Payments
Bank) and ₹27.78 lakh (Western Union) |
Paytm: Misrepresentation
in application for Certificate of Authorisation under Payment and Settlement
Systems Act, 2007; |
October 1, 2021 (Paytm); |
CONCLUDING REMARKS
This compounding order
is not a major financial setback for Paytm but underscores the importance of
strict compliance with FEMA regulations in cross-border investments. It also
reflects the RBI’s increasing vigilance over fintech companies’ international
transactions.
· RBI penalties focus on compliance failures in KYC, cyber security, and
payment system regulations.
• FIU
penalty was more severe in terms of reputational risk, as it linked Paytm
Payments Bank to money laundering and illegal gambling networks.
• The
₹5.39 crore and ₹5.49 crore fines are among the largest regulatory actions
against Paytm Payments Bank, while the ₹1 crore penalty in 2021 was tied to
authorization irregularities.
R V SECKAR , FCS , LLB 79047 19295




