If the activities of the LO not restricted to purchase of goods in India for the purpose of export, then, the Liaison Office (LO) of non-resident taxpayer would qualify as business connection PE in India for tax purpose.
The Case law -
Columbia Sportswear Company Vs. DIT (International Taxation), Bangalore – (Advance Ruling Authority) –
The
Liaison Office of appellant was carrying out various activities such as
ensuring the choice of
quality material, occasional quality testing, conveying of requisite design,
picking out competitive sellers, etc, in addition to the activities relating to
the purchase of goods. . Moreover, the Liaison Office assisted the business of
the applicant in Bangladesh and Egypt from India. It will be unrealistic that all the activities other than
the actual sale of the goods are not integral part of the business of the applicant
and have no role in the profit being made by the applicant on the sale of its branded products. Further, all its profits cannot be said to have accrued
outside India since the sales are made outside India. Considering the nature of
the activities carried by the Liaison Office in India, and that the activities
supported the business in Egypt and Bangladesh, the operations
of the applicant in India cannot be said to be confined to the purchase of
goods only in India for the purpose of export. Hence the purchase/ sourcing exemption
under the Income-Tax Act is not available to the applicant.
The Liaison Office constitutes a fixed place PE
of the applicant in India under Article 5(1) of the DTAA, since
the applicant was carrying at least a part of its business through such office
(except the selling activity). With respect to the PE exclusion clause under
Article 5(3)(d) of the DTAA, it was held that this exclusion is not applicable
since the activities of the Liaison Office are not limited only to purchase of
goods or merchandise or for collection of information for the enterprise.
Further, as the Liaison
Office is engaged in conducting a substantial part of the business of the
applicant, its activities cannot be classified as preparatory or auxiliary as
understood under the exclusionary clause 3(e) of Article 5 of the DTAA.
Accordingly,
the applicant shall be
taxable in India but only in respect of the income which can be attributed to
the operations carried out by the Liaison Office in India
No comments:
Post a Comment